Another selection from my perusals, in no special sequence …
I chortled so immoderately I filled my codpiece with widdle.
[Katy Wheatley]
To say ‘I wonder’ is to say ‘I question; I ask.’ The mind seeks. Sometimes it finds answers, sometimes it does not. We need wonder in order to keep moving and growing – to stay alive to the world. It gives us meaning and, in fact, makes us human.
[Marian Bantjes; I Wonder]
It was their wonder, astonishment, that first led men to philosophise, and still leads them.
[Aristotle; Metaphysics]
I’m not weird, I’m limited edition.
[unknown]
I may be a little weird, but I’d rather be weird and right than normal and wrong.
[Paul Stamets, Mycologist]
In the realm of medicine, sham treatments have long had a name: placebos. I suggest we call the equivalent treatments in society “placebos at large”. In fact I want to make the analogy with placebo medicine still closer. In much the same way that we have “invented” witch doctors to provide spells and potions that allow us to overcome the timidity of our bodily healing systems and cure ourselves of physical disease, so we have created witch institutions, witch ceremonies, witch arts to cure ourselves of incipient mental and social disease.
[Nicholas Humphrey, “Placebos at large: the power of society’s symbols”, New Scientist; 03 August 2013]
Life is a disease; sexually transmitted, and invariably fatal
[unknown]
“You see, I don’t mind what happens” … To “accept” the way things are is to stop resisting reality; to stop using positive thinking to try to pretend things are different. Put like that, acceptance seems like a precondition for change, not an obstacle to it.
[Oliver Burkeman writing about Kristnamurti in the Guardian, 10 August 2013]
No event can trigger upset without a belief that it’s undesirable.
[Oliver Burkeman writing about Kristnamurti in the Guardian, 10 August 2013]
Things themselves have no natural power to form our judgements.
[Marcus Aurelius]
All posts by Keith
Here We Go Again!
Just what is it about politicians? They just cannot seem to learn from even the most recent past. Nor can they stand back and take a long, cold, hard look at where they’re going.
The US and the UK are about to get themselves embroiled in Syria. Why?
Oh someone has used some (internationally banned) chemical weapons.
Yes, OK that is reprehensible (to put it politely). But it doesn’t excuse blatant aggression by other people.
Look guys. Just stop and think!
1. Within the last few years the US and UK have meddled in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya that I can think of quickly. None of them with any real justification (and in the case of Iraq based on a known wrong set of beliefs). Result? Long-term involvement in two of them and no real useful result in the third. All it has done is waste the lives of our military personnel and waste a load of money that frankly we don’t have.
2. What is happening in Syria is civil war — just as in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Egypt. War, by definition, produces atrocities. That is no reason for us to go adding to them.
3. So you want to get involved in Syria on the side of the rebels against Assad? You do realise, don’t you, that those rebels are the very people you were fighting against in Afghanistan and Iraq: al-Qa’ida and the Taliban? OK we know you’re two-faced (you’re politicians, after all) but really!
Now no-one is pretending that the use of chemical weapons is acceptable. But this is NOT an excuse for the US and UK to go around continuing to be bullies. Especially as we know that short sharp interventions never are. Remember Iraq?
No, this is a matter for the UN. Their inspectors need to be allowed to complete their work, report, have their report considered. The if the international community (in the guise of the UN) is still unhappy it is for the UN to take action. Unilateral action by the US and/or the UK is just not acceptable.
David Cameron … If you continue down this path of action, you will become as reviled by everyone as was Tony Bliar, who rightly earned the epithet Tony B Liar. Up with such actions we, the people, will not put! Such actions will definitely lose you the next election (if you’ve not lost it already). Is that really what you want?
Barack Obama … The same applies to you.
When even your (ex-)military chiefs are saying this is misguided, maybe that should be telling you something.
Gawdelpus!
Gor Blimey!
Purely out of interest I’ve just done a count-back of my blogging activity.
I’ve been blogging properly, in several incarnations, since January 2004; and doing the equivalent by email since December 2001.
In that time I reckon I’ve written at least 2187 posts (not including this one). That’s an average of over 15 posts a month over that period — although the early days were much sparser and rate is higher in the last couple of years.
Everything since November 2006 should be here and accessible via the Archives or Categories listings on the right.
Earlier posts are available as PDF files on the website:
* January-October 2006 at zenmischief.com/files/zm_weblog_2006.pdf
* Everything Before 2006 at zenmischief.com/files/zm_weblog_pre2005.pdf
HS2
So who should be most in favour of HS2, the proposed high-speed rail connection from London to Birmingham and the north?
Well if it is as essential to the economy as we are told it is, business should be lobbying hard in its favour.
Are they? … No, they are not!

According to a report in yesterday’s Independent, and elsewhere, the Institute of Directors (ie. the captains of our businesses) considers HS2 “a giant folly”. Just 41% of IoD members consider HS2 important for their business and only 27% see it as good value for money.
Businesses know value for money when they see it, and our research shows that they don’t see it in the Government’s case for HS2 … The IoD cannot support the Government’s current economic case for HS2 … We agree with the need for key infrastructure spending, but the business case for HS2 simply is not there. The money would be far better spent elsewhere and in a way that will benefit much more of the country. Investment in the West and East Coast main lines, combined with a variety of other infrastructure projects, would be a far more sensible option.
[Simon Walker, IoD Director-General]
Interestingly there was another report in the Telegraph last December (which I had not previously picked up) exposing the fact that the projected passenger numbers also do not stack up with the business case.
Hurrah for some common sense! I’ve been saying this since HS2 was first mooted. Cynically I’d say that HS2 is the rail industry willy-waving and indulging in self-aggrandisement to distract from the fact that is hasn’t/can’t sort out the current rail infrastructure and get that working efficiently — something which should cost a lot less than the currently projected £50billion price tag for HS2. Let’s sort out what we have first and then see if we still need such a massive, environmentally and financially destructive project as HS2.
And anyway, in the current economic climate, do we really have this amount of money to throw around?
Did You Miss …?
One of the things I have just not got to do over the last few weeks is to keep everyone updated with interesting snippets. But I have continued to collect items for your delectation. So here is our occasional round-up of links to things you may have missed.
First of all let’s return to an old subject: Fukushima … There was a scare story a few weeks back that babies in the Pacific NW USA are dying due to radioactivity from the Fukushima disaster. Except that it was just that: scaremongering. If the data is analysed correctly there is no problem at all.
However Fukushima does have a problem with radioactive water which is leaking from the storage tanks. As usual the whole think appears to be being badly handled and badly communicated.

While on pollution … Lime trees are often accused of dropping gunk onto cars. Well at least the aphids feeding on non-native species do. But here’s something on the English lime tree (above), which is at the northern edge of its range but is doing well because of the exceptionally warm summer.
Over in Colombia and Ecuador they’ve discovered a new mammal species, the Olinguito, a type of raccoon. It has been hiding in plain sight as a museum specimen, but is still alive and well in the wild.
Back in the USA, scientists in California recently had the opportunity to necropsy a freshly dead fin whale. Here’s a photo-essay on how you do it (and no, it isn’t that gory).
As the whale was still alive when found, it’s a shame the scientists couldn’t take their EEG machines along. Apparently scientists have discovered signs of heightened consciousness in the brain just after physiological death — in rats.

So from the scary to the scary … Men in Sweden were warned to keep their bathing trunks on in the sea after a testicle-eating pacu fish (above) was found in the strait between Sweden and Denmark. Except, of course, that it was all bollocks. First off pacu (cousins of piranha) are South American tropical freshwater fish so wouldn’t survive long in a cold northern sea. Secondly they are fruit and seed eaters, not human nut eaters. And anyway the testicle-eating comment from the scientist was a joke which was, as usual, misinterpreted. Pacu do get big and scary though and a large specimen would certainly be capable of giving you a very nasty nip.
But here’s what you do if you do get bitten/stung by something in the sea. And, no, peeing on it doesn’t work!
And here’s something you girls shouldn’t do … According to a lady American economist most of what you’re told to eat/not eat during pregnancy is myth with little if any scientific basis.
Meanwhile there is a growing swell of opinion that atheist extraordinaire Richard Dawkins is as much a bigot as any believer and is actually doing a great disservice to atheism. Must say I have long thought this.
And now let’s turn to the historic …
Archaeologists in Poole, Dorset are recovering a mid-17th century shipwreck just off the coast and trying to find out about the ship involved. They have some amazingly well preserved finds, including an enormous moustachioed head (above).
Near our own time, who remembers Lamson Tubes? Pneumatic tubes to send stuff like mail (below) around was all the rage at one time especially in America, but also in the UK. They even sent a bewildered cat through the mail in one as a test. We shouldn’t be surprised because such a system was once seriously suggested as a propulsion system for the London underground!
Back in the far distant past we learnt to cook by trial and error. But it seems that haute cuisine is earlier than we thought as archaeologists have now found the remains of a spicy herb in 6000 year old pots from northern Germany and Denmark.
Now right up to date … What’s the biggest threat to London? Yep: flooding. Diamond Geezer takes an interesting look at London’s contingency planning.
Meanwhile some guy has spent 49 years working out whet each every London Underground station tastes like. The poor chap has lexical-gustatory synaesthesia, where words trigger tastes in his brain. The tastes range from the rather nice (cauliflower cheese) through the bizarre (fuzzy felt & ketchup, anyone?) to the frankly nauseating (putrid meat). I can’t work out whether I was better off living at Diced Swede or Soft Black Wine Gum and Potato!
And so from the tasty to the (perhaps) tasteless …
It seems we British are more open about having it off, as long as we aren’t cheating.
And it seems that science nerdy girls want sex with stimulating and interesting partners (who may also be science nerds).
And finally two items on having hair. Whether you’re male or female there’s nothing wrong with having hairy bits, nor with shaving them, as long as the latter doesn’t give you shaving rash. Ouchy!
Weekly Photograph
As regular readers will have noticed we were in Oxford yesterday where I spotted this mega cup. It was in the window of Alice’s Shop in St Aldate’s, almost opposite Christ Church. It is absolutely magnificent and I reckon probably holds at least a gallon (4.5 litres) because, yes, that is a normal sized cake stand next to it!

Mega Cup
25 August 2013, Oxford
Grand Day Out
Today we went to Oxford. Just to meet up and have lunch with our friend Gabriella who is here from Sweden for a few days. We were all surprised to realise that the last time we met was in Washington, DC almost exactly 4 years ago! Which is somewhat scary. We all said the others hadn’t changed.
The friends Gabriella is staying with had recommended a Chinese restaurant called Shanghai 30s in St Aldates, almost opposite Christ Church (which is where Charles Dodgson, aka. Lewis Carroll, taught mathematics).
If you weren’t looking you’d miss the restaurant. It is in a slightly shabby but ordinary looking building, through a communal door and up a slightly seedy passage and stairway. Inside it is very definitely Chinese-colonial 1930s.
Do not be deceived, though. The food is everything the outside isn’t: sumptuous, delicious, slightly unusual, sizzling hot and beautifully presented.
We started with the Hors d’Oeuvre Platter (to share): Qi Family’s Almond Chicken; Champagne Spare Ribs; Crispy Ji-Li King Prawns; Veggie Spring Rolls. These were definitely finger food, but so hot you couldn’t pick them up. OK, so Spring Rolls are Spring Rolls, and everyone does King Prawns in Filo Pastry, but these were good. The Almond Chicken was basically minced chicken patties rolled in flaked almonds and fried — an unusual (to me at least) idea and very yummy. The ribs were marinaded and cooked in a honey and champagne BBQ sauce; individual portions wrapped in foil — seriously sticky and seriously yummy.
Then we shared a selection of main courses:
Sizzling Seafood in Black Pepper Sauce — prawns, squid, scallops; very sticky; very tasty.
Tsingtao Beer Duckling — slow cooked duck with black mushrooms & peppers.
Pork a la Shanghai — belly pork with ginger, garlic and vegetables in a rice wine sauce.
Pak Choi with Black Mushrooms
Noodles (with all sorts of additives: meat, prawn, squid …)
Jasmine Rice
Somehow we all then managed a pudding, if only crispy fried ice cream!
OK so we didn’t push the boat out with the drink (just a couple of bottles of sparkling mineral water and I had a couple of small beers). But at under £35 a head (including service) for something which was really delicious was very reasonable. If we’re in Oxford we shall certainly go back.
Added to which I spent the meal looking at this painting:

Shanghai 30s, Oxford. Rating: ★★★★★
When we eventually managed to regain full vertical hold, we meandered through Oxford, just enjoying what had turned into a lovely sunny afternoon. And, following a diversion into the Oxfam Bookshop, we adjourned to the King’s Arms for a drink before saying our good-byes.
Basically it was a lovely, relaxing lunch and afternoon; full of chat, catching up and some gorgeous food.
Word: Hallux
Hallux, plural halluces.
1. The innermost or first digit on the hind foot of certain mammals. In humans the hallux is the big toe.
2. The equivalent digit of a bird, reptile or amphibian. In birds it is often directed backward.
The hallux corresponds to the pollex, or thumb, of the fore limb.
According to the OED the first recorded use was in an anatomy book of 1831.
The suggestion is that it is a medieval Latin blend of allus, hallus (thumb) and hallex (big toe).
Quote: Life
Five Questions, Series 4 #4
OK, OK … I know … I’ve not finished answering series 4 of “Five Questions”. And no, I hadn’t forgotten! Here’s the answer to question four.

Question 4: Is it even possible to create a Utopia?
Well surprisingly, yes it is possible; but it is possible only ever in your mind, because as novelist Chuck Palahniuk observes:
The unreal is more powerful than the real, because nothing is as perfect as you can imagine it. Because it’s only intangible ideas, concepts, beliefs, fantasies that last. Stone crumbles. Wood rots. People, well, they die. But things as fragile as a thought, a dream, a legend, they can go on and on.
Moreover there is human nature to contend with. If one were able to create whatever your notion of Utopia is, two things will apply:
(a) It would not be anyone else’s idea of Utopia. My Utopia is not your Utopia, and vice versa. We all have different ideas of perfection. So there would be an immediate disagreement (or worse), which by its very existence would destroy Utopia.
(b) No sooner had Utopia been created than you would think of something else you’d like, or which it should/shouldn’t contain and have to start over (or at least change things around) … ad infinitum.
So yes, Utopia is possible, but only as an individual mental concept.