This question is posed by Vanessa Woods in her blog Your Inner Bonobo. As an anthropologist Woods, an Australian living in America, clearly doesn’t understand the default American assumption that the answer to the question is “Yes”.
This is something about America that puzzles me. What do children stare at for the first year of their life? I think it’s a female breast. Did [male student] think at the sight of naked breasts, every child under 5 would be lining up for a feed, like at an ice cream truck? What is it, exactly, about breasts, that would be so terrifying to children?
[…] at no time have I seen a woman in public pull down her top and breast feed her child – which is totally common place in oz. And my friends here have told me it’s not socially acceptable.
Can someone explain it to me? Why is a wardrobe malfunction [as per Janet Jackson] a threat
to moral authority?
I fear that the explanation for America and the UK lies in the puritanism of the religious right. And of course as I’ve blogged before (for instance here) this seems to me and many others to be the root cause of the high rate of teenage pregnancy etc. in these two countries.
But what is the real answer to the question? Are children really traumatised by nudity?
No, of course they’re not! Isn’t it daft just to suggest that they are?
In a recent-ish article in British Naturism’s magazine (BN, issue 182, Winter 2009; I’ve naughtily put a copy of the article online as it isn’t otherwise freely accessible to non-members) Roni Fine
explores the issues that surround the presumption from the outside world that simply being nude means a lot of saucy goings-on.
Yes a large part of the article is about the erroneous perception that the naturist movement is, by its very nature, merely a cover for “adult” activity. It isn’t, and there’s the problem. Roni Fine goes on …
Too many people […] just cannot differentiate nudity from sex. If only they would visit a typical naturist club […]
The times I have heard people say it is “disgusting” to be undressed in front of children. They use [children] to warrant their own outrage […]
Outrage, I might add, which the same people cannot articulate when asked. Fine continues …
Children are not associating what they see with anything remotely sexual; they just see bodies. They grow up with a realistic attitude to the human form. I envy their upbringing.
And further on here’s the crux of the whole problem at an individual level: basically people don’t think things through:
[…] something is only “rude” if you perceive it to be so. How can the natural body be deemed as rude? We all have one, it is how we are made and it isn’t “rude” until someone tells us it is … so who are they to decide? And why let them dictate their own hang ups onto other people?
As BN’s researched briefing paper Children and Nudity says:
Young children are completely oblivious to their own nudity. Consider the archetypal nude toddler in the supermarket with a trail of discarded clothing behind them.
As they get older they are taught that clothing must be worn but until about age 10 or 11 it doesn’t really take hold. They will quite happily go naked when the circumstances are appropriate.
As children enter their teens they become more body conscious and unless they have prior experience of naturism they are usually nervous about participating.
Many naturist children become more reticent as they enter their teens but then teenagers are notorious for not wanting to do the things that their parents do. They do usually continue to participate, at least for activities such as swimming, and many return to naturism when they become more mature […]
There is no evidence that children are any more at risk at naturists events than at equivalent textile events. Indeed in some ways they are safer.
Let me end on a personal note …
I admit I had a somewhat bohemian upbringing, back in the 1950s and 60s. So it should be no surprise that when I was about 9 or 10 my parents were foresighted enough to organise a couple of summer holidays at a nudist club in Essex. I was totally not bothered by this; indeed I enjoyed the nudity and running round in the sun all day. Yes I realised that little girls were constructed differently to me; just as there was a difference between my parents’ anatomies. Beyond that I couldn’t care less; if anything I was more amused by the size and shape of peoples’ bums (typical small boy!). And that was the point; it was all part of my education to make me aware that people were all different and to be comfortable with nudity. It succeeded. I have retained that comfort ever since, even (as I recall) through the embarrassed teenage years.
So there we seem to have an answer. Are children traumatised by nudity? Absolutely not – unless the adults they’re with tell them they are.
Adults … get a life!
People not differentiating between sex and nudity – yes exactly – the two are different. You don't have to be nude to have sex and being nude doesn't mean you are about to have sex or have just had it.My brother and I always had a bath with my mother when we were children – probably would be regarded as child abuse now!