Why is it that female circumcision (aka mutilation) is not acceptable, but that the medical world believes that male circumcision is OK and even good practice?
Wake up and smell the coffee guys — it’s all abuse!
Why is it that female circumcision (aka mutilation) is not acceptable, but that the medical world believes that male circumcision is OK and even good practice?
Wake up and smell the coffee guys — it’s all abuse!
Comments are closed.
NHS blog doctor – link from jillysheep – posted an interesting piece about this recently – if you scroll down you’ll see it under the title – ‘Foreskins . . . .’
What the article you’ve linked to doesn’t mention is that the type of cervical cancer in which the human papilloma virus is implicated is almost never found in Jewish women married to Jews . . . Which could be an argument for circumcisionThe media in general conveniently forget that there are many different types of cervical cancer not just that one. So they are using the current high profile of cervical cancer to push a completely different agenda – not good by any stretch of the imagination.
Thanks for the pointer to the “NHS blog doctor”, Jilly. Most interesting item.