Today I’m going to return to one of my perennial subjects: prostitution.
A couple of weeks ago New Scientist (12 December) carried an Opinion piece by Clare Wilson under the title Safer Sex Work. As I’m not sure if the linked article is generally accessible on the New Scientist website, I post here the core of the article.
Evidence suggests nations should legalise, not ban, prostitution
Do we help sex workers most by legalising or criminalising what they do? …
A proposed bill [in Scotland] that would decriminalise prostitution there has just finished its consultation stage. In the UK, selling sex isn’t illegal but related acts are, such as soliciting, kerb-crawling and working in a brothel. These would be allowed under the Scottish bill.
In 2012 [MSP] Jean Urquhart favoured a form of criminalisation. Then she went to a debate involving sex workers. What she heard … has led her to “come full circle”. [The] bill is modelled on a 2003 New Zealand law … backed by [WHO] …
… if what you do is illegal, it is harder to work with others or hire guards — that’s classed as working in a brothel. If you get attacked you dare not go to the police. And you are less likely to use services that provide free condoms and treat sexually transmitted infections …
Some opponents of legalisation want the “Swedish model”, where it is illegal to pay for sex but not to provide it, to avoid penalising sex workers. But a sex worker whose customers get arrested will quickly have no customers at all. So it still forces them to operate in secret, leading to the same problems.
As one sex worker says, the debate tends to revolve around feelings about men who pay for sex and what that says about society. She wants to scream: “What about our safety?”
Despite many opinions to the contrary (and despite being totally illogical), we know that the “Swedish model” doesn’t work: see for instance here and here. Unlike in New Zealand which has gone the opposite route to general acclaim.
I remember reading about this Scottish bill some while back and it did seem to me to be the most sensible and logical way forward. Prostitution isn’t going to go away. So legalising, or at least decriminalising, it seems the best approach: the sex workers can be protected, registered and have regular medical checks; that protects their clients as well; and once something is legal and regulated it can be taxed (and what government doesn’t want money for nothing?).
That looks like win-win-win to me.
The winners of the first annual Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards have been announced.
And the winner was this wonderful image entitled “Rush Hour”.
Another from the archives this week as I wanted something suitable unto the season, but it isn’t nice and frosty (like it should be) so nothing new on the horizon. So here is one of I think the earliest digital photographs I took — it was so early I’ve lost the date but from memory it was actually a February and was pre-Autumn 2005 as we use this as our Christmas card that year.
These roses were in our garden. We have this magnificent pink rose which just flowers and flowers and flowers from mid-May onwards. And whatever year this was it carried on flowering until the buds got well and truly killed off by heavy frost.
This week on Thinking Thursday I asked you the following question:
Why? Because the only place on earth where a bear can go south, west and north equal distances and end up where it started is the North Pole. Travelling east or west you travel along parallels which are circles equidistant from the poles. And travelling north or south you travel along meridians which are circles that cross both the north and the south poles. Which is all part of the geometry of the surface of a globe.
